Saturday, February 16, 2013

Keeper rotation error

This was important enough to where I felt the need to make a post about it. My post about keeper rotation highlighted the combination of DC and Chicago keepers since they had surprisingly low predicted goals conceded... too low to be right. So, I revisited the data and realized there is a gameweek where neither of them play. So, I now advise NOT to go with a combination of DC and Chicago. I am looking at other potential options, with LA likely being the team I focus on to find a pairing for. LA was a completely different team defensively when they had Omar Gonzalez return from injury and I think Cudicini will be an upgrade over Saunders to boot.

The following keeper combinations have a week where neither play, so their numbers are too low:
Houston/Seattle
Houston/LA
Seattle/LA
Philly/Toronto
Philly/Vancouver
Toronto/Vancouver
Chicago/COlumbus
Chicago/DC (missing 2 gameweeks in fact)
Columbus/DC
Chicago/Dallas
DC/Dallas

1 comment:

  1. I believe they actually have 2 weeks where they both do not play. GE5 and GW10

    The chart I made can help find that out: http://kentuckyfootballclub.wordpress.com/mls-resources/#HArotate

    I actually like the having LA at least for the first 6 weeks. They have a very easy set of games.

    ReplyDelete